Cute! No on 4 to Beethoven's Fifth.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Cute Bird in British Colombia
Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama
Colin Powell not only endorses Obama, he also speaks out for religious liberty. I am so grateful for that, I got tears in my eyes. Worth listening to the whole 7 minutes, because the tears came during the last two.
Got hope? Oh yes.
Friday, October 17, 2008
This is how bad it would be if Prop 4 passes
I found this set of diagrams here. Even without reading the text, they show the mind-boggling hurdles Prop 4 would put in place of California minor teens seeking an abortion...and their doctors.
To start with, simply compare what happens today with what would happen if Prop 4 passes, even for a teen who is able to tell her parents:
Today:
If Prop 4 passes:
Even the minor teen who can involve her parents would have to be very careful to document and verify that she and her doctor are following the law, or the doctor could be sued decades later. And that's the easy case!Here's what it looks like if a minor teen seeks a judicial by-pass:
Here's what it looks like if she chooses to notify an alternate adult relative (this one takes THREE pages):

We need to make sure people understand how this law would really work (or not work)! To find out how you can help, go to www.noonprop4.org
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Mystic Forest
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Vote NO on California's Prop 4
This election marks the third time a handful of anti-choice men have paid millions of dollars to signature gatherers to put a Parental Notification Constitutional Amendment on the ballot. Like Propositions 73 (2005) and 85 (2006) before it, Proposition 4 would prohibit young women from obtaining an abortion without government-mandated parental notification -- unless they go to court or document charges of parental abuse.
California voters defeated the previous two attempts because we understand that although parental notification laws may sound good, in the real world they put teenagers in danger. While we hope our teens will tell us if they are facing an unintended pregnancy, more than anything, we want them to be safe.
Most pregnant teens do involve their parents. But sadly, of the teens who don’t, most have very good reasons not to. Some fear being kicked out of the house, beaten, or worse. Others are faced with a difficult family situation, like parental substance abuse or serious health or financial problems, and simply cannot go to their parents.
Laws cannot force family communication! But they can cause desperate teens to do desperate things. We know from experiences in other states with parental notification laws in place that rather than tell a parent, teens:
- Delay care until their 18th birthday, greatly increasing the risk of complications
- Travel to other states where parental notification is not required
- Take matters into their own hands, or seek illegal providers – putting their lives at risk.
The more people learn about Proposition 4 (and Propositions 73 and 85 before it), the more they oppose these dangerous laws. But in this presidential election, we need to reach millions of new voters. Find out how you can help at www.noonprop4.org.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Unbelievably Horrifyingly Funny (or scary, if they win)
First, watch this Saturday Night Live skit of the Palin-Couric interview.
Now watch this segment of the real interview.
I had read that SNL used Palin's words verbatim...but I never imagined how many!!
Friday, August 29, 2008
"Windex" Lakes
Thursday, February 28, 2008
Tulip Magnolias
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Mystery burrow
Elephant Seals at Piedras Blancas
One thing I remember well, is the docent's grim prediction of how these new mammas and babies would fare if the big storm came in as expected. Not well. The next day, while the storm raged even stronger than expected, I thought of the elephant seals often. Tough life!
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Road Trip
Monday, December 24, 2007
Friday, December 21, 2007
The Story of Stuff
Watch this video! It's in seven installments, which come up automatically when chapter one finishes. All together it takes 20 minutes, but I think it's worth it. Watch the first two chapters and then decide for yourself.
Warning: you might never go to a big box discount store again after watching it. But that would be OK, I think. ...unless it's to purchase LED Christmas lights, that is.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Green Holiday tip #2

Sunday, December 2, 2007
Green Holiday tip for procrastinators who put up Christmas Lights
Hopefully, you've already heard about how efficient and long lasting LED Christmas lights are. I mean, it was on CNN! The only downside is the price, according to the CNN Report. The good news is, these LED bulbs are:- 10x more efficient than incandescent mini bulbs
- 50x more efficient than incandescent traditional bulbs
- long lasting: they don't burn out for, like, 100 years (ok, maybe a little less than that) and they don't break as easily...they're strong plastic, not thin glass.
They have an earthier, richer color tone that I like.
So, right. The price. Look for them on sale early next season (or maybe you'll still find some deals this year). I found a great price at...well, I don't want to name names or anything, but...two syllables: first one sounds like "lost", second one sounds like "low"
Friday, November 23, 2007
Here's one of my all-time favorite eco-tips, perfect for the day after Thanksgiving:
"...Kelsa says that instead of wasting plastic wrap or tinfoil, and in order to conserve the water and energy you would use to wash Tupperware, leftovers should just be placed on the floor for the dogs."
Woof.
Monday, November 12, 2007
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Carbon Offsets Skeptics
Here's how it works:
My round-trip flight contributed 3170 lbs. of CO2 to the atmosphere. The $34.55 carbon offsets I just purchased buy wind-generated electricity, which replaces electricity that would have emitted 3,170 lbs. of CO2 to produce. The wind-generated electricity company is only allowed to sell carbon offsets for that clean electricity once, and they are the only ones allowed to sell it. Otherwise it doesn't work.
Pretty confusing, huh? No wonder people tend to be skeptical about Carbon Offsets. My skeptical friends used to just frustrate and annoy me. But then I thought, maybe I can learn something from their reaction. Maybe there is a better way to describe Carbon Offsets that make them more intuitive and less "scary."
Here is my suggestion:
One day, I was thinking about the efficiency measures I’ve taken in my own home, and wondering what I could do next. I realized that I’ve addressed all the low-hanging fruit, and at this point, the investment of resources is big compared to the CO2 savings to be gained.
Then I thought of my friend, who lives in a poorly insulated, drafty house. I could save more CO2 by paying to insulate and seal her house than I could by spending the same amount of money on the next project in my house (never mind how socially awkward that would be!).
That is the concept behind carbon offsets.
After you’ve reduced your CO2 emissions as much as you can or are willing to do, you buy carbon offsets so that other people can reduce CO2 emissions. The bigger the pool of CO2-reducing projects to choose from, the more CO2 you can reduce with the same amount of money.
Of course, you have to trust the organization that distributes the funds to make good choices and not cheat (sell the same offsets more than once). Many of the large environmental groups certify offset providers, which gives you confidence that your money will be wisely spent on real offsets.
Try this on the next skeptic you run across and tell me if it works!




